Some fundamental premises – regularly usual by way of leaders and supported via the led – work out the collective judgment of right and wrong of the ledgers as they stimulate a willed development. The development is generally superior but no longer necessarily civilized. The premises in a query are of this shape: “Our stage of technological advancement is second to none. Upon attaining this degree, we also ought to prepare our society for peace and to guarantee the peace, and the era needs to be revised to foster the policy of struggle.” The technological development is driven on this route units a risky precedent for different societies that worry a threat to their respective sovereignties. They are pushed to foster war technology additionally.
In civilization’s domain, this model of development is not praiseworthy, neither is it morally justifiable. Since it is not morally justifiable, it’s miles socially irresponsible. An inspection of the premises will reveal that it’s miles the closing one, which poses a problem. The ultimate premise is the realization of previous premises. However, it isn’t in any way logically deduced. What it suggests is a passionately deduced end, and being so, it fails to be reckoned as a conclusion from rationally prepared thoughts, at the least at the time at which it became deduced.
A society that advances consistent with the above presuppositions – and especially in line with the illogical conclusion – has transmitted the psyche of non-negotiable superiority to its humans. All alongside, the electricity of ardor dictates the pace of human conduct. Whether in constructive engagements or willed partnerships, the precept of equality fails to paintings precisely because of the superiority syndrome that grips the leader and the led. And a one-of-a-kind society that refuses to share in the collective sensibilities or passion of such society has, with the aid of the expected logic, emerge as an ability or actual enemy and faces confrontation on all feasible fronts.
Most of what we find out about the present international, the route, through the media, is dominated by the ultra-modern generation’s aid. Societies with the maximum of such technology are also, again and again, claimed to be the most advanced. It isn’t always the handiest of their advancement that lifts them to the pinnacle of strength, superiority, and reputation. They also can use era to simplify and circulate forward and know-how of life and nature in a specific direction, a course that tends to cast off, as a great deal as viable, a prior connection among life and nature that become, in lots of respects, mystical and dangerous. This final point does now not necessarily mean that technological development is a mark of a superior civilization.
What we want to realize is that civilization and generation are not conjugal terms. Civilized human beings may additionally have sophisticated technology, or they may now not have it. Civilization is not only a count number of science and generation or technical infrastructure, or, again, the wonder of buildings; it also has to do with the moral and intellectual reflexes of human beings and their stage of social connectedness inside their very own society and beyond. It is from human beings’ overall behavior makeup that all sorts of bodily structures will be created, so too the query of technological know-how and era.
Thus, the kind of bridges, roads, homes, and heavy equipment, amongst others, that we can see in society may want to tell, in a trendy way, the people’s behavioral pattern. The behavioral sample could also tell loads about the extent to which the natural environment has been applied for infrastructural activities, technology, and technology. Above all, the behavioral sample should inform plenty of approximately the people’s perceptions and knowledge about different human beings.
I do believe – and, I suppose, most people do accept as true with – that upon accelerating the charge of infrastructural sports and technology, the environment has to recede in its naturalness. Once advancing generation (and its attendant systems or ideas) competes with the green surroundings for space, this environment that houses trees, grass, flowers, all forms of animals, and fish has to cut back in size. Yet the growth of populace, the relentless human yearning for first-class life, the need to manipulate existence without relying on the unpredictable condition of the herbal environment set off the use of generics. Technology needs now not pose an unwarranted hazard to the herbal surroundings. It is the misuse of an era this is in question.
While a society may justly use technology to enhance high-quality life, its humans also need to ask: “how a lot of generations will we need to guard the herbal surroundings?” Suppose society Y blends the slight use of era with the natural environment to offset the reckless destruction of the latter. This type of positioning activates the factor that society Y is a lover of the principle of balance. From this precept, you could boldly conclude that society Y favors stability extra than chaos and has, consequently, the experience of ethical and social duty. Any modern generation factors to the sophistication of human thoughts, and it indicates that the herbal surroundings have been cavalierly tamed.
If people no longer need to stay at the mercy of the natural surroundings – which, of direction, is an unsure way of life – however, in keeping with their personal anticipated tempo, then using generation is a matter of route. It would seem that the principle of balance that society Y has selected should only be for a short while or that this is extra of a make-agree with the role than a real one. When the electricity of the human mind gratifies itself following a momentous fulfillment in technology, retreat, or, at satisfactory, a gradual-down is quite uncommon. It is as though the human mind is telling itself: “technological advancement has to boost up with no obstruction. A retreat or a gradual system is an insult to the inquiring mind.” This kind of idea only factors out the enigma of the mind, its darkish aspect, not its greatest area. And in search to interrogate the present mode of a positive era according to the instructions of the mind, the function of ethics is integral.
Is it morally proper to apply this sort of era for this form of the product? And is it morally proper to apply this type of product? Both questions hint that the product or merchandise in question are both dangerous or not, environmentally pleasant or not, or that they do not simplest cause damage directly to people however at once to the environment too. And if, as I have stated, the cause of generation is to improve the fine of lifestyles, then to apply technology to produce products that damage both people and the natural environment contradicts the reason of generation. It also falsifies an announcement that human beings are rational. Furthermore, it shows that the sophisticated degree that the human mind has reached cannot comprehend the essence or intent of exceptional life. In this regard, a nonviolent coexistence with the herbal surroundings could have been abandoned for the sake of an unrestrained, inquiring human mind. The human thoughts might, because they had been, become corrupted with beliefs or thoughts that are untenable in any variety of approaches.
The advocacy that environmentalists carry out relates to environmental degradation and its poor results on people. They insist that there may be no justification for generating excessive-tech products that damage human beings and the herbal surroundings. This rivalry sounds persuasive. High technology can also show the height of human accomplishment, but it could now not a factor in ethical and social responsibility. And up to now, the question may be asked: “In what approaches can people close the chasm among unrestrained high era and environmental degradation?”
Too often, most current humans tend to assume that a sophisticated way of life is premier to an easy one. The former is supported using a load of excessive generation; the latter is normally not. The former eases the burden of relying on an excessive amount of the herbal surroundings’ dictates; the latter no longer. The latter tends to seek a symbiotic relationship with the herbal environment; the previous does no longer. Whether human consolation should come largely from a complicated generation or the herbal environment isn’t a matter that might be without difficulty answered. If the natural surroundings are shrinking because of population increase and other unavoidable causes, then the advanced generation is needed to alleviate the pressures to the human consolation that stand up. It is the irresponsible proliferation of, say, struggle technology, excessive-tech merchandise, amongst others, that need complaints and must stop.