High Technology and Human Development
Some fundamental premises – regularly used by leaders and supported via the led – work out the collective judgment of right and wrong of the ledgers as they stimulate a willed development. The development is generally superior but no longer necessarily civilized. The premises in a query are of this shape: “Our stage of technological advancement is second to none. Upon attaining this degree, we also ought to prepare our society for peace and to guarantee peace, and the era needs to be revised to foster the policy of struggle.” The technological development driven on this route sets a risky precedent for societies that worry about a threat to their sovereignty. They are also pushed to foster war technology.
In civilization’s domain, this model of development is not praiseworthy, nor is it morally justifiable. Since it is not ethically defensible, it’s miles socially irresponsible. Inspecting the premises will reveal that it’s miles from the closing one, which poses a problem. The ultimate premise is the realization of the previous premises. However, it isn’t in any way logically deduced. What it suggests is a passionately deduced end, and being so, it fails to be reckoned as a conclusion from rationally prepared thoughts, at least at the time at which it became deduced.
A society that advances consistent with the above presuppositions – especially in line with the illogical conclusion – has transmitted the psyche of non-negotiable superiority to its humans. All alongside, the electricity of ardor dictates the pace of human conduct. Whether in constructive engagements or willed partnerships, the precept of equality fails to paint precisely because of the superiority syndrome that grips the leader and the leader. A one-of-a-kind society that refuses to share in the collective sensibilities or passion of such society has, with the aid of the expected logic, emerged as an ability or actual enemy and faces confrontation on all feasible fronts.
Most of what we find out about the present international route through the media is dominated by the ultra-modern generation’s aid. Societies with the maximum of such technology are also, again and again, claimed to be the most advanced. It isn’t always the handiest of their advancement that lifts them to the pinnacle of strength, superiority, and reputation. They also can use era to simplify and circulate forward and know-how of life and nature in a specific direction, a course that tends to cast off, as a great deal as viable, a prior connection among life and nature that becomes mystical and dangerous in many respects.
This final point does now not necessarily mean that technological development is a mark of a superior civilization. We want to realize that civilization and generation are not conjugal terms. Civilized human beings may additionally have sophisticated technology, or they may not have it now. Civilization is not only a count number of science and generation or technical infrastructure, or, again, the wonder of buildings; it also has to do with the moral and intellectual reflexes of human beings and their stage of social connectedness inside their society and beyond. From human beings’ overall behavior makeup, all sorts of bodily structures will be created, and so will the query of technological know-how and era.
Thus, the kind of bridges, roads, homes, and heavy equipment, amongst others, that we can see in society may want to tell, in a trendy way, the people’s behavioral patterns. The behavioral sample could also tell how much the natural environment has been applied for infrastructural activities and technology. Above all, the behavioral sample should provide plenty of information about people’s perceptions and knowledge of other human beings.
I believe – and, I suppose, most people accept as true – that the environment has to recede in its naturalness upon accelerating the charge of infrastructural sports and technology. Once the advancing generation (and its attendant systems or ideas) competes with the green surroundings for space, this environment that houses trees, grass, flowers, animals, and fish has to cut back in size. Yet the growth of the populace, the relentless human yearning for first-class life, and the need to manipulate existence without relying on the unpredictable condition of the herbal environment set off the use of generics. Technology does not pose an unwarranted hazard to the herbal surroundings. It is the misuse of an era that is in question.
While a society may justly use technology to enhance high-quality life, its humans must also ask: “How many generations will we need to guard the herbal surroundings?” Suppose society Y blends the slight use of era with the natural environment to offset the reckless destruction of the latter. This type of positioning activates the factor that society Y loves the principle of balance. From this precept, you could boldly conclude that society Y favors stability more than chaos and, consequently, has the experience of ethical and social duty. Any modern generation factors to the sophistication of human thoughts, indicating that the herbal surroundings have been cavalierly tamed.
If people no longer need to stay at the mercy of the natural surroundings – which, of direction, is an unsure way of life – however, in keeping with their anticipated tempo, then using generation is a matter of route. It would seem that the principle of balance that society Y has selected should only be for a short while or that this is more of a make-agree with the role than a real one. When the electricity of the human mind gratifies itself following a momentous fulfillment in technology, retreat, or, at satisfactory, a gradual-down is quite uncommon. It is as though the human mind is telling itself: “Technological advancement has to boost up with no obstruction. A retreat or a gradual system is an insult to the inquiring mind.” This idea only factors out the enigma of the mind, its darkish aspect, not its greatest area. In search to interrogate the present mode of a positive era according to the mind’s instructions, the function of ethics is integral.
Is it morally proper to apply this sort of era for this product? And is it ethically correct to use this type of product? Both questions hint that the product or merchandise in question is dangerous or not, environmentally pleasant or not, or that they do not simply cause damage directly to people but at once to the environment. And if, as I have stated, the cause of generation is to improve the quality of lifestyles, then applying technology to produce products that damage both people and the natural environment contradicts the reason for generation. It also falsifies an announcement that human beings are rational.
Furthermore, it shows that the sophisticated degree the human mind has reached cannot comprehend the essence or intent of exceptional life. In this regard, a nonviolent coexistence with the herbal surroundings could have been abandoned for the sake of an unrestrained, inquiring human mind. Because they have been, human thoughts might become corrupted with untenable untenable beliefs or ideas in various approaches.
TEnvironmentalists’ advocacy relates to environmental degradation and its poor results on people. They insist there may be no justification for generating excessive-tech products that damage human beings and their surroundings. This rivalry sounds persuasive. High technology can also show the height of human accomplishment, but it could now not be a factor in ethical and social responsibility. Up to now, the question may be asked: “In what approaches can people close the chasm between unrestrained high era and environmental degradation?”
Too often, most current humans assume that a sophisticated way of life is superior to an easy one. The former is supported using a load of excessive generation; the latter is normally not. The former eases the burden of relying on an excessive amount of the herbal surroundings’ dictates; the latter no longer. The latter seeks a symbiotic relationship with the herbal environment; the previous does no longer. Whether human consolation should come largely from a complicated generation or the herbal climate isn’t a matter that might be answered without difficulty. I suppose the natural surroundings are shrinking because of population increase and other unavoidable causes. In that case, the advanced generation is needed to alleviate the pressures of the human consolation that stands up. The responsible proliferation of, say, struggle technology and excessive-tech merchandise, amongst others, tneedsneedslaints and must stop.
