Andragogy and pedagogy confer with the theories and methods involved in offering training to adults and children, respectively. This submit elaborates on the similarities and differences between those two coaching patterns.
TAGGED UNDER: Teaching
“Tell me, and I overlook, teach me, and I may also bear in mind, involve me, and I examine.”
Learning involves acquiring critical understanding, and it’s far a lifelong process that begins at the beginning and ceases at the demise of a person. Throughout the extraordinary tiers of life, people learn the new behavior, capabilities, values, expertise, alternatives, data, and many others—the potential to study and keep in mind all that is unique for all people. Human studying happens not best as a part of formal schooling and education, however also as part of fashionable everyday interactions with buddies, family, and strangers. Some studying is compulsory in life. However, most of the people of it are voluntary and contextual. As a character learns, the received records subtly mold and modify that character’s perspective and outlook.
RELATED POSTS :
What are Pedagogy and Andragogy?
Learning takes place at various levels in someone’s existence. Initially, informal and basic education is given by using one’s mother and father. This installs inside an individual a primarily social and moral code of behavior. Later, as we start developing, we attend colleges, faculties, after which universities collect vital knowledge that could prove useful in turning into a hit person. At every one of these levels, training is imparted in a one-of-a-kind approach. In different words, the manner we study in college is substantially distinct from how we are taught in faculties and universities. This distinction in coaching techniques correlated with the learner’s age gives upward thrust to 2 concepts: pedagogy (kid’s training) and andragogy (person education).
Pedagogy Vs. Andragogy
➤ Education of children (students).
➤ Education of adults (newcomers).
➤ Dependent on the instructor.
➤ Independent but guided with the aid of the teacher.
➤ The trainer is chargeable for what is taught and the way it’s miles learned.
➤ The learner is liable for his/her very own learning.
➤ The trainer evaluates the quantity of studying.
➤ The learner self-evaluates the level of learning.
➤ The learner has no earlier revel in that can be used as a resource for getting to know, and as a result, is predicated on the instructor’s revel in.
➤ Adults possess a wealthy source of life-studies that form the manner they apprehend and research.
Interest for Learning
➤ The trainer has to generate interest within the scholar for the difficulty.
➤ Learning is pursued because of an inherent interest in that precise concern.
➤ Extrinsic motivation is needed, i.E., rewards for gaining knowledge properly and punishments for failing to research.
➤ The learner is intrinsically influenced by factors consisting of reputation, self-esteem, first-class of existence, self-assurance, etc.
Medium of Teaching
➤ Passive techniques like lectures, seminars, and demonstrations.
➤ Active strategies like discussions, debates, worksheets, surveys, and so forth.
The common component between these teaching procedures is the truth that both are problem-centered tactics. Both involve the offering of training from an authoritative figure to the learner thru interactions. In both strategies, the trainer affords support, comments, and assets for a higher acquisition of knowledge using the learner. And finally, both methods result in instructing the person and reworking his/her perspective and outlook.
In recent times but, instructional methods are undergoing radical reforms. Many educators think that the teaching method must be based on the individual’s intellectual functioning, as opposed to his/her age. This implies that, depending on the individual’s grasping electricity and the extent of the difficulty’s problem, a new approach should be carried out, such that it adopts components of each teaching strategies.