Apple’s IOS Vs Google’s Android OS Vs Blackberry’s Rim Vs Microsoft’s Windows Mobile

Part 1: Current Situation

Let’s start with Apple.

Apple has been a strong emblem of the Great Gossip in the mobile industry since it began. We’ve seen iPhones and iPads, all ranging from decent to excellent great gadgets. Of course, every new machine has its troubles, but Apple continually played on the ball pretty quickly. They supply high-quality hardware but a chunk of lackluster software programs in certain areas.

I’ll provide you with an easy instance. The menu of your iPhone or iPad. It’s not too smooth to exchange the layout of things or to personalize it, as they say. With the usual software, Apple has set certain regulations on what you can and cannot do. Of direction, clever humans have found a way around this; however, nonetheless, charging bucketloads of cash for an excessive best product without being able to upload a non-public contact? A bit strange, in case you ask me…

Another software-related problem that held me back from ever shopping for an iPhone or an iPad was the necessity to use iTunes. iTunes is a wonderful application, don’t get me wrong. I apply it on a bi-weekly basis for my iPod. However, I anticipated more from Apple regarding their iPhones and iPads. Any media you need to load on the inner reminiscence of said gadgets calls for iTunes. TTo a positive degree, I can recognize the desire to use further software.

But iTunes is too clunky to use. It’s sluggish in some cases. It takes a long time to finish record transfers. It doesn’t allow you to preserve a few authentic media codecs because they must be converted first. For me, this is a rather bad thing of, in other cases, outstanding merchandise. I favor getting things done well, quickly, and hassle-free.

Next up, we got Google with the Android OS.

Google has become a family emblem for every person, even those remotely connected to the internet or generation. They have come a long way; however, they also have a long way to go. I’m an Android user (not always a fanboy, though), and I like the kingdom Android is in.

It does not fulfill all my wishes, though. I’m a media character. None of the Android OSes, whether its authentic releases or custom-designed ROM, can fully fulfill me. I think there is a light at the end of the tunnel; however, we must eagerly look ahead and notice what destiny holds in store for us.

The largest drawback of the Android OS is this: Gingerbread is nice for smartphones, but not all fashions will see a (reputable) Gingerbread version. For drugs, Honeycomb is an awesome piece of software, but not all capsules get an improvement to Honeycombs, which is supposed to be THE Android OS until we get Ice Cream Sandwich to get a “unified experience from both worlds.”

In this regard, Apple is more consistent in making an entire OS to cover a certain tool’s desires and strengths. I’m quite sure Ice Cream Sandwich (from what I’ve seen to date) makes a big step on the right path. But there may still be paintings to be performed after that. But we’re getting ahead of ourselves here; we’ll come back to Ice Cream Sandwich in a while.

This all brings us to Blackberry. Where to start on this count?

For years, Blackberry has been a norm for enterprise customers and also a fair proportion of non-enterprise users. Everyone had to own a Blackberry to ensure the most appropriate cellular experience on their smartphones or tablets. And Blackberry nonetheless grants a few remarkable business capabilities on its devices—if it works properly, that is.

I’m sure you have all heard about the recent Blackberry outage, which left most (if not all) its users internationally without e-mail and net offerings for some days. We’re not speaking to approximately some hundred people right here, folks; we’re talking to roughly a GLOBAL OUTAGE of the most used services on a telephone or pill. After the entirety was sorted, they tried to make up for this by giving alby00 bucks worth of top-rate programs at no cost”.

Let’s be honest: how many of you had three or more useful top-rated apps in that package deal? Most of you acquire diddly squat. Which method is Blackberry best made up for enterprise users if they, without a doubt, had any use for top-class apps? All other customers were given left in the cold. A current survey mentioned that 60% of present-day Blackberry users will now not sign up for a brand new Blackberry device after their settlement expires. Ouch!

On a brighter note, this will not be the end of Blackberry or RIM. However, the same applies to Blackberry as to Google: set a step in the proper course and continue pushing forward from that point on. If you want people to stay with Blackberry or even attract new clients, you will get your act together earlier rather than later.

Last but no longer least, we’ve Microsoft’s Windows Mobile.

I think Windows Mobile ought to be a dark horse in this race. It has been around for some time but hasn’t had any exceptional success. However, it hasn’t been placed out of business by the other competitors, either. It’s always been around, and consider me; it will be around for much longer after competitors have disappeared into obscurity.

Microsoft’s Windows Mobile, or Windows Phone as it has been formally known, has been a synonym for great personal studies (basically, at minimum) combined with first-rate hardware to agree with Windows-esque surroundings. Windows Phone has constantly been geared toward customers and is no longer always at organizations like Blackberry’s RIM.

RELATED POSTS :

• Important Questions You Must Ask a Potential Web Developer
• The Nuts and Bolts of Android Development
• Windows Vs. Mac – A Beginner Guide Before Buying
• Mobile Marketing – The World Has Gone Mobile
• Why Should You Invest in Android Apps?

After being canceled in 2004, Microsoft reorganized the Windows Mobile Group, leading to the first, albeit in-between, Windows Mobile release in 2009. Things did not start well because Windows Mobile wasn’t well matched with any Windows Phone packages. This resulted in a loss of assets and time.

Eventually, the OS’s name was modified to Windows Phone 7. (It sounds catchy, don’t you suspect?) As of this writing, Microsoft has sealed an address with Nokia (sure, they may still be around) to distribute Windows Phone 7 on a new line of smartphones coming to a place near you. However, the genuine locations are nevertheless undisclosed. You ought to love a few mystery people!

Part 2: The future?

In my opinion, this fatal 4-manner will lead to a 3-horse race, with the opposite participant sitting inside the seats looking on and slowly biding their masterfully professional go-back plan to the scene. I’ll explain my destiny vision of Cell Global:

The top brands will remain Apple, with their iOS, and Google, with their Android OS. Both agencies seem to be heading down the same path regarding software development, personal revelations, and hardware enhancements. However, Apple still has a huge head start because it manipulates all manufacturing and improvement methods.

Android will continue to focus on increasing mobile devices’ income (not shipped units, actual income). However, it will continue to be a piece in the back of Apple’s undisputed leadership of the cutting-edge market. A twist for the leadership may appear at some unspecified time in the future, but I wouldn’t assume it within the first years. However, we can see the market nighttime out slowly yet step by step.

Windows Mobile can appeal to maximum low-give-up, non-technical customers. They have a line of first-rate smartphones, which are clean to apply with decent hardware below the hood, produced with Nokia’s aid. Not every person desires to pay huge amounts of money for a cellphone, and in reality, not everyone desires all functions available on iOS or Android smartphones or tablets. Will we ever see Windows Mobile on a tablet? Only time will tell, but it’d be a smart choice, in my opinion.