Every Man Is An Island: The Fragmentation of Android

Android has had a few first-rate successes as a working Genius Zone system. The critics said that Android producers took a back seat to Apple; Android turned into exact, but iOS became higher. Over the last few years, Android’s success has critics seeing the Apple enemy in an entirely new mild, with a few suggestions that the destiny of the smartphone enterprise lies with Android manufacturers and no longer with the Apple Corporation – an agency that many as soon as the notion was invincible and past failures.

Android’s success became a great thing; it was supposed to assist Android producers in seeing the fulfillment that they may reap and propel them to heights of which they’d never dreamed. Android’s success was speculated to be the motivation and effect its manufacturers needed to surpass Apple and iOS. I worry the worst, but with Android’s growing success, its producers are beginning to see their businesses as “superstars,” dividing Android, as soon as a cohesive whole, into individual portions or fragments. We are at the point of the fragmentation of Android.

Before you place this text down and stroll away, let me explain. Earlier this week at the International CES, LG Electronics announced that the Nexus four changed into the most effective primary collaborative efforts with Google:

“Through our collaboration with Google, we released the LG Nexus 4 telephone. This is the primary one of many gadgets that came from our developing partnership with this very selective agency” (underline mine).

RELATED POSTS :

• Google’s Android Phones Challenge Apple iPhone For Smartphone Market Share
• The Nuts and Bolts of Android Development
• The 48 Laws of Power Through Spirituality
• IPads, Android, and the Rest of the World
• The Frameworks That Simplify the Development of an eCommerce Store

What this indicates is that we will look ahead to a Nexus 5 and six, likely a “Nexus Nine” or “Nexus Eleven” one in all nowadays (relying on how the Nexus smartphones are named, in assessment to the Nexus drugs). Sometime after LG made this statement, however, the International Business Times claimed that “the Nexus 4 production ‘is claimed to have [been] halted,’ with LG interested in building its next-gen devices” (Chris Smith, “Nexus four manufacturing reportedly halted, as LG is focusing on destiny smartphones, Nexus five included?”).

What is this intended to mean? To be blunt, LG has determined to abandon the Nexus Four in want of its very own smartphones. Supposedly, the LG Optimus G has made the agency develop and be assured of shifting ahead to boost its motive. As for its assignment with Google? Well, LG looks to paint with them in the future. However, no particular time frame was given for when the two businesses might come together. Consumers who desire to get their arms on a Nexus 4 are left expecting the following Nexus task (in a year or two).

In an editorial on the Google X Phone, I stated that it might no longer be a smart flow for Google to push Samsung out of the way. I assumed that Samsung would want to stay in the Android production group. While Samsung’s phones have made Android the OS to be envied, Samsung has also worked on an OS of its own: Tizen. Reports surfaced in the closing two weeks that Samsung will produce more Tizen phones this year than ever before.

This means that Samsung, which has never long gone public about its “OS inside the wings,” intends to promote its personal OS in its hardware this year. Some say that that is in response to Google’s plans to create an X smartphone; thinking that Google published its assertion first, I could now not be surprised if Samsung’s selection to press forward has something to do with Google’s desire to rule Android (and Samsung’s choice to rule Tizen).

Now, LG has advanced and made the same circulate as Google: figuring out how to position its work ahead of its partnership with Google. LG’s pass can also be a political reaction to Google’s X telephone announcement: seeing that Google is shifting forward with its telephone, LG looks to do the same. Unlike Google or Samsung, however, it does not have the financial sources to retain generating one line of smartphones even as running on a brand new line, so it has decided to pull its sources collectively and begin on some other cellphone (past the LG Optimus G and Nexus 4).

This tells the customer: “While LG and Google produced an excellent smartphone together, nothing topics more than our own cellphone line and business enterprise name. If left to select between our telephones and a partnership telephone, the companion smartphone mission could be the primary to head.” This did not bode nicely for an organization until Optimus G and Nexus 4 were no longer recognized for their telephone collections.

With Google’s circulation to create a hundred Google cellphones, Samsung’s flow to have its personal independent Tizen OS, and LG’s withdrawal from its Google venture to pursue its line, we have the start of what’s known as “the fragmentation of Android.” This curious declaration refers to the breakdown of what changed as soon as a unified OS, a set of smartphone and software program producers who, once unified, decided to move their separate methods and create their own Android flavors that stick out from the relaxation. The fragmentation of Android refers back to the breakdown of a unified OS into individual companies and their tech achievements. In other phrases, corporations that once stated, “It’s about we” (more than one manufacturer) will now say, “It’s about me” (our one organization)!

This mindset, lamentably, will be adverse for Android as a whole. Android has grown to be successful via not only harmony but also diversity. The range of the Android atmosphere, running collectively with its hardware producers’ settlement, had saved the working gadget together – even when it struggled to compete with Apple’s iOS. There is unity in diversity and diversity in solidarity, and these concepts have made Android what it is these days. Unfortunately, Android producers are beginning to trust that there can be no range in solidarity (best in division); this mindset will allow Apple to divide and overcome its approach to stay on the pinnacle inside the telephone international.

Apple has made its success appear with a dictatorial, specific approach. The agency produces its personal OS and maintains stern control over its carriers and plans. It does the whole thing for itself and only does what it wants. Samsung had already proven in 2012, while it beat Apple in the ultimate zone ($8. 3 billion vs. Apple’s $8. 2 billion), that running with Google has been a hit venture, in preference to going at the tech enterprise alone.

Now that Samsung has demonstrated that “there’s no ‘I’ in ‘crew,'” Android manufacturers need to push their financial income above Apple’s. However, Android producers are starting to assume that they can accomplish more alone than they can in collaboration with others. This is a dangerous mindset to leave a direction of destruction behind. The reality is within the sales: If clients are compelled to pick between companies instead of working structures, Google and Samsung will rack up income while corporations with HTC, LG, and other lesser-recognized names will lose in the telephone war.

Englishman John Donne once wrote the statement, “No guy is an island.” If this is true, Donne’s words could not be truer than in the current Android situation. Android’s achievement has come through collaboration and innovation—a mixture of preference and isolation. Remove one of the equation elements, and the Android “I-land” will become nothing.